Kiribati vs Nauru: Co2 emissions fossil land
Kiribati
72,456
in 2024
Nauru
61,390
in 2024
Kiribati rank
204th
Nauru rank
205th
Co2 emissions fossil land over time
- Kiribati
- Nauru
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 72,456 against 61,390 in Nauru, a difference of 11,066.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Nauru ahead.
Kiribati ranks 204th and Nauru ranks 205th of 210 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17,709 | 42,747 | 25,037 | Nauru |
| 1970s | 28,213 | 95,997 | 67,784 | Nauru |
| 1980s | 23,450 | 138,133 | 114,683 | Nauru |
| 1990s | 27,846 | 109,554 | 81,707 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 43,968 | 60,090 | 16,122 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 60,090 | 49,098 | 10,992 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 70,118 | 57,800 | 12,318 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 emissions fossil land, Kiribati or Nauru?
- Kiribati, at 72,456 against 61,390 in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 emissions fossil land between Kiribati and Nauru?
- 11,066, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for co2 emissions fossil land?
- Kiribati ranks 204th and Nauru ranks 205th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Co2 emissions fossil land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.