Cape Verde vs Jamaica: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth

Cape Verde
3.9 % change on previous year
in 2024
Jamaica
4.12 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
48th
Jamaica rank
45th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Jamaica
-50050100150195119872024

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 4.12 % change on previous year against 3.9 % change on previous year in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.22 % change on previous year.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 36 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Jamaica ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 48th and Jamaica ranks 45th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 7 and Jamaica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Jamaica Difference Ahead
1950s -11.86 % change on previous year 26.43 % change on previous year 38.29 % change on previous year Jamaica
1960s 12.48 % change on previous year 11.85 % change on previous year 0.6291 % change on previous year Cape Verde
1970s 26.76 % change on previous year 8 % change on previous year 18.76 % change on previous year Cape Verde
1980s 2.49 % change on previous year -0.6632 % change on previous year 3.15 % change on previous year Cape Verde
1990s 17.33 % change on previous year 4.11 % change on previous year 13.22 % change on previous year Cape Verde
2000s 6.43 % change on previous year -1.73 % change on previous year 8.16 % change on previous year Cape Verde
2010s 2.22 % change on previous year 2 % change on previous year 0.2142 % change on previous year Cape Verde
2020s -0.6449 % change on previous year -1.29 % change on previous year 0.6463 % change on previous year Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth, Cape Verde or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 4.12 % change on previous year against 3.9 % change on previous year in Cape Verde as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth between Cape Verde and Jamaica?
0.22 % change on previous year, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Jamaica?
74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Jamaica rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth?
Cape Verde ranks 48th and Jamaica ranks 45th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Jamaica: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/cabo-verde/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/cabo-verde/jamaica/">Cape Verde vs Jamaica: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 21,968 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.