Czechia vs Finland: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth
Czechia
-9.14 % change on previous year
in 2024
Finland
-6.36 % change on previous year
in 2024
Czechia rank
212th
Finland rank
209th
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth over time
- Czechia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports -6.36 % change on previous year against -9.14 % change on previous year in Czechia, a difference of 2.78 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 81 times across 164 shared years of data; in 1861 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 212th and Finland ranks 209th of 215 countries.
Across the 17 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 4 and Finland in 13.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 50.1 % change on previous year | 13.25 % change on previous year | 36.85 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1870s | 14.16 % change on previous year | 4.67 % change on previous year | 9.49 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 1880s | 5.21 % change on previous year | 10.94 % change on previous year | 5.73 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1890s | 3.38 % change on previous year | 18.91 % change on previous year | 15.53 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1900s | 2.17 % change on previous year | 8.78 % change on previous year | 6.61 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1910s | -1.76 % change on previous year | 11.03 % change on previous year | 12.79 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1920s | 3.29 % change on previous year | 38.26 % change on previous year | 34.98 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1930s | 1.74 % change on previous year | 5.86 % change on previous year | 4.12 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1940s | 3.13 % change on previous year | 39.96 % change on previous year | 36.83 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1950s | 5.19 % change on previous year | 11.73 % change on previous year | 6.54 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1960s | 3.85 % change on previous year | 11.05 % change on previous year | 7.2 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1970s | 3.17 % change on previous year | 3.8 % change on previous year | 0.6252 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1980s | -0.5537 % change on previous year | 0.1658 % change on previous year | 0.7195 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 1990s | -3.78 % change on previous year | 1.33 % change on previous year | 5.11 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 2000s | -0.0659 % change on previous year | 0.0559 % change on previous year | 0.1218 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 2010s | -1.26 % change on previous year | -2.41 % change on previous year | 1.15 % change on previous year | Czechia |
| 2020s | -5.41 % change on previous year | -6.73 % change on previous year | 1.32 % change on previous year | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth, Czechia or Finland?
- Finland, at -6.36 % change on previous year against -9.14 % change on previous year in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth between Czechia and Finland?
- 2.78 % change on previous year, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Finland?
- 164 years are reported by both, from 1861 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Finland rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth?
- Czechia ranks 212th and Finland ranks 209th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.