Aruba vs Eswatini: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Aruba
920,644 tonnes
in 2024
Eswatini
1.04 million tonnes
in 2024
Aruba rank
168th
Eswatini rank
166th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Aruba
  • Eswatini
01.0M2.0M3.0M192619752024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1.04 million tonnes against 920,644 tonnes in Aruba, a difference of 123,996 tonnes.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 168th and Eswatini ranks 166th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 6 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Eswatini Difference Ahead
1950s 630,584 tonnes 3,664 tonnes 626,920 tonnes Aruba
1960s 660,602 tonnes 115,416 tonnes 545,186 tonnes Aruba
1970s 771,616 tonnes 372,629 tonnes 398,988 tonnes Aruba
1980s 571,059 tonnes 414,765 tonnes 156,294 tonnes Aruba
1990s 667,214 tonnes 983,785 tonnes 316,571 tonnes Eswatini
2000s 2.59 million tonnes 1.05 million tonnes 1.54 million tonnes Aruba
2010s 1.25 million tonnes 1.01 million tonnes 234,862 tonnes Aruba
2020s 875,477 tonnes 1.02 million tonnes 140,731 tonnes Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Aruba or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 1.04 million tonnes against 920,644 tonnes in Aruba as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Aruba and Eswatini?
123,996 tonnes, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Eswatini?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Aruba and Eswatini rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Aruba ranks 168th and Eswatini ranks 166th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Eswatini: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/aruba/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/aruba/eswatini/">Aruba vs Eswatini: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.