Belarus vs Singapore: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Belarus
55.82 million tonnes
in 2024
Singapore
53.92 million tonnes
in 2024
Belarus rank
54th
Singapore rank
55th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Belarus
  • Singapore
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M185019372024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 55.82 million tonnes against 53.92 million tonnes in Singapore, a difference of 1.90 million tonnes.

Across all 75 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 54th and Singapore ranks 55th of 215 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Singapore Difference Ahead
1950s 27.97 million tonnes 2.94 million tonnes 25.03 million tonnes Belarus
1960s 51.16 million tonnes 3.06 million tonnes 48.10 million tonnes Belarus
1970s 81.21 million tonnes 24.66 million tonnes 56.55 million tonnes Belarus
1980s 105.23 million tonnes 32.45 million tonnes 72.78 million tonnes Belarus
1990s 75.77 million tonnes 48.69 million tonnes 27.09 million tonnes Belarus
2000s 58.17 million tonnes 39.89 million tonnes 18.28 million tonnes Belarus
2010s 61.51 million tonnes 48.00 million tonnes 13.51 million tonnes Belarus
2020s 57.73 million tonnes 50.14 million tonnes 7.59 million tonnes Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Belarus or Singapore?
Belarus, at 55.82 million tonnes against 53.92 million tonnes in Singapore as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Belarus and Singapore?
1.90 million tonnes, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Singapore?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Singapore rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Belarus ranks 54th and Singapore ranks 55th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Singapore: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/belarus/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/belarus/singapore/">Belarus vs Singapore: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.