Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Dominica: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
151,882 tonnes
in 2024
Dominica
170,858 tonnes
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
200th
Dominica rank
197th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Dominica
0100.0k200.0k300.0k192619752024

How they compare

Dominica currently reports 170,858 tonnes against 151,882 tonnes in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 18,976 tonnes.

That makes Dominica's figure about 1.1 times Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 200th and Dominica ranks 197th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba averaged higher in 4 and Dominica in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Dominica Difference Ahead
1950s 182,922 tonnes 5,292 tonnes 177,629 tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1960s 184,447 tonnes 15,389 tonnes 169,058 tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1970s 215,443 tonnes 27,480 tonnes 187,963 tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1980s 128,975 tonnes 45,434 tonnes 83,542 tonnes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1990s 68,831 tonnes 69,982 tonnes 1,152 tonnes Dominica
2000s 98,412 tonnes 139,598 tonnes 41,186 tonnes Dominica
2010s 118,978 tonnes 164,880 tonnes 45,902 tonnes Dominica
2020s 143,168 tonnes 163,807 tonnes 20,638 tonnes Dominica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Dominica?
Dominica, at 170,858 tonnes against 151,882 tonnes in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Dominica?
18,976 tonnes, with Dominica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Dominica?
74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Dominica rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 200th and Dominica ranks 197th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Dominica: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/dominica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/dominica/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Dominica: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.