Democratic Republic of Congo vs Latvia: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Democratic Republic of Congo
5.90 million tonnes
in 2024
Latvia
6.46 million tonnes
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
132nd
Latvia rank
129th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Latvia
010.0M20.0M30.0M185019372024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 6.46 million tonnes against 5.90 million tonnes in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 557,440 tonnes.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

Across all 105 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 129th of 215 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Latvia Difference Ahead
1920s 169,602 tonnes 435,768 tonnes 266,166 tonnes Latvia
1930s 109,468 tonnes 1.96 million tonnes 1.85 million tonnes Latvia
1940s 237,091 tonnes 2.79 million tonnes 2.55 million tonnes Latvia
1950s 2.59 million tonnes 6.72 million tonnes 4.12 million tonnes Latvia
1960s 2.53 million tonnes 12.27 million tonnes 9.75 million tonnes Latvia
1970s 3.26 million tonnes 19.50 million tonnes 16.24 million tonnes Latvia
1980s 3.73 million tonnes 22.30 million tonnes 18.57 million tonnes Latvia
1990s 3.02 million tonnes 11.71 million tonnes 8.69 million tonnes Latvia
2000s 2.16 million tonnes 7.80 million tonnes 5.64 million tonnes Latvia
2010s 3.43 million tonnes 7.56 million tonnes 4.13 million tonnes Latvia
2020s 5.25 million tonnes 6.78 million tonnes 1.52 million tonnes Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Democratic Republic of Congo or Latvia?
Latvia, at 6.46 million tonnes against 5.90 million tonnes in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Democratic Republic of Congo and Latvia?
557,440 tonnes, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Latvia?
105 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Latvia rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 129th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Latvia: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/latvia/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Latvia: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.