Democratic Republic of Congo vs Moldova: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Democratic Republic of Congo
5.90 million tonnes
in 2024
Moldova
5.33 million tonnes
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
132nd
Moldova rank
135th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Moldova
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M185019372024

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 5.90 million tonnes against 5.33 million tonnes in Moldova, a difference of 577,610 tonnes.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 105 shared years of data; in 1920 it was Moldova ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 132nd and Moldova ranks 135th of 215 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Moldova Difference Ahead
1920s 169,602 tonnes 673,084 tonnes 503,483 tonnes Moldova
1930s 109,468 tonnes 3.05 million tonnes 2.94 million tonnes Moldova
1940s 237,091 tonnes 4.30 million tonnes 4.07 million tonnes Moldova
1950s 2.59 million tonnes 10.39 million tonnes 7.80 million tonnes Moldova
1960s 2.53 million tonnes 19.07 million tonnes 16.54 million tonnes Moldova
1970s 3.26 million tonnes 30.34 million tonnes 27.08 million tonnes Moldova
1980s 3.73 million tonnes 37.64 million tonnes 33.91 million tonnes Moldova
1990s 3.02 million tonnes 15.69 million tonnes 12.67 million tonnes Moldova
2000s 2.16 million tonnes 4.51 million tonnes 2.35 million tonnes Moldova
2010s 3.43 million tonnes 4.97 million tonnes 1.54 million tonnes Moldova
2020s 5.25 million tonnes 5.34 million tonnes 85,570 tonnes Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Democratic Republic of Congo or Moldova?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 5.90 million tonnes against 5.33 million tonnes in Moldova as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Democratic Republic of Congo and Moldova?
577,610 tonnes, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Moldova?
105 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Moldova rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 132nd and Moldova ranks 135th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Moldova: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/moldova/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Moldova: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.