Congo vs El Salvador: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Congo
8.84 million tonnes
in 2024
El Salvador
8.97 million tonnes
in 2024
Congo rank
113th
El Salvador rank
112th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • El Salvador
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M187019472024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 8.97 million tonnes against 8.84 million tonnes in Congo, a difference of 132,520 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was El Salvador ahead.

Congo ranks 113th and El Salvador ranks 112th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo El Salvador Difference Ahead
1950s 153,006 tonnes 465,482 tonnes 312,476 tonnes El Salvador
1960s 305,944 tonnes 1.02 million tonnes 709,659 tonnes El Salvador
1970s 824,766 tonnes 1.99 million tonnes 1.17 million tonnes El Salvador
1980s 1.11 million tonnes 2.05 million tonnes 932,370 tonnes El Salvador
1990s 2.78 million tonnes 4.35 million tonnes 1.57 million tonnes El Salvador
2000s 4.06 million tonnes 6.26 million tonnes 2.20 million tonnes El Salvador
2010s 5.78 million tonnes 6.46 million tonnes 682,637 tonnes El Salvador
2020s 8.18 million tonnes 7.73 million tonnes 449,060 tonnes Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Congo or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 8.97 million tonnes against 8.84 million tonnes in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Congo and El Salvador?
132,520 tonnes, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and El Salvador?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Congo and El Salvador rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 113th and El Salvador ranks 112th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs El Salvador: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/el-salvador/">Congo vs El Salvador: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.