Congo vs Mozambique: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Congo
8.84 million tonnes
in 2024
Mozambique
8.61 million tonnes
in 2024
Congo rank
113th
Mozambique rank
115th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • Mozambique
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M192719752024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 8.84 million tonnes against 8.61 million tonnes in Mozambique, a difference of 227,140 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Mozambique ahead.

Congo ranks 113th and Mozambique ranks 115th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mozambique Difference Ahead
1950s 153,006 tonnes 1.34 million tonnes 1.19 million tonnes Mozambique
1960s 305,944 tonnes 2.23 million tonnes 1.92 million tonnes Mozambique
1970s 824,766 tonnes 3.02 million tonnes 2.20 million tonnes Mozambique
1980s 1.11 million tonnes 1.68 million tonnes 564,879 tonnes Mozambique
1990s 2.78 million tonnes 1.09 million tonnes 1.69 million tonnes Congo
2000s 4.06 million tonnes 1.86 million tonnes 2.20 million tonnes Congo
2010s 5.78 million tonnes 5.68 million tonnes 99,464 tonnes Congo
2020s 8.18 million tonnes 8.21 million tonnes 30,490 tonnes Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Congo or Mozambique?
Congo, at 8.84 million tonnes against 8.61 million tonnes in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Congo and Mozambique?
227,140 tonnes, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mozambique?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Congo and Mozambique rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 113th and Mozambique ranks 115th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mozambique: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/mozambique/">Congo vs Mozambique: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.