Costa Rica vs Jamaica: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Costa Rica
8.76 million tonnes
in 2024
Jamaica
8.40 million tonnes
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
114th
Jamaica rank
116th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Jamaica
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M187019472024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 8.76 million tonnes against 8.40 million tonnes in Jamaica, a difference of 358,690 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 114th and Jamaica ranks 116th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Jamaica Difference Ahead
1950s 395,094 tonnes 980,435 tonnes 585,341 tonnes Jamaica
1960s 770,269 tonnes 3.07 million tonnes 2.30 million tonnes Jamaica
1970s 2.09 million tonnes 7.34 million tonnes 5.25 million tonnes Jamaica
1980s 2.42 million tonnes 5.99 million tonnes 3.57 million tonnes Jamaica
1990s 4.40 million tonnes 8.78 million tonnes 4.38 million tonnes Jamaica
2000s 6.77 million tonnes 10.38 million tonnes 3.60 million tonnes Jamaica
2010s 7.60 million tonnes 8.13 million tonnes 526,593 tonnes Jamaica
2020s 7.93 million tonnes 7.71 million tonnes 221,194 tonnes Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Costa Rica or Jamaica?
Costa Rica, at 8.76 million tonnes against 8.40 million tonnes in Jamaica as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Costa Rica and Jamaica?
358,690 tonnes, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Jamaica?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Jamaica rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Costa Rica ranks 114th and Jamaica ranks 116th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Jamaica: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/costa-rica/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/costa-rica/jamaica/">Costa Rica vs Jamaica: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.