Cuba vs Denmark: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Cuba
24.44 million tonnes
in 2024
Denmark
28.37 million tonnes
in 2024
Cuba rank
81st
Denmark rank
80th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Cuba
  • Denmark
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M185019372024

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 28.37 million tonnes against 24.44 million tonnes in Cuba, a difference of 3.93 million tonnes.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.

Across all 169 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 81st and Denmark ranks 80th of 215 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 18 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Denmark Difference Ahead
1850s 350,285 tonnes 607,308 tonnes 257,023 tonnes Denmark
1860s 541,425 tonnes 830,629 tonnes 289,203 tonnes Denmark
1870s 633,373 tonnes 1.35 million tonnes 713,513 tonnes Denmark
1880s 632,943 tonnes 2.40 million tonnes 1.77 million tonnes Denmark
1890s 905,675 tonnes 3.80 million tonnes 2.90 million tonnes Denmark
1900s 1.49 million tonnes 6.15 million tonnes 4.67 million tonnes Denmark
1910s 3.21 million tonnes 8.88 million tonnes 5.66 million tonnes Denmark
1920s 1.73 million tonnes 10.87 million tonnes 9.14 million tonnes Denmark
1930s 889,214 tonnes 14.78 million tonnes 13.89 million tonnes Denmark
1940s 532,545 tonnes 17.67 million tonnes 17.14 million tonnes Denmark
1950s 9.07 million tonnes 24.68 million tonnes 15.61 million tonnes Denmark
1960s 14.61 million tonnes 43.83 million tonnes 29.22 million tonnes Denmark
1970s 25.02 million tonnes 59.43 million tonnes 34.41 million tonnes Denmark
1980s 33.34 million tonnes 54.72 million tonnes 21.38 million tonnes Denmark
1990s 23.84 million tonnes 62.30 million tonnes 38.47 million tonnes Denmark
2000s 25.95 million tonnes 54.74 million tonnes 28.79 million tonnes Denmark
2010s 27.38 million tonnes 38.49 million tonnes 11.11 million tonnes Denmark
2020s 23.00 million tonnes 28.84 million tonnes 5.84 million tonnes Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Cuba or Denmark?
Denmark, at 28.37 million tonnes against 24.44 million tonnes in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Cuba and Denmark?
3.93 million tonnes, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Denmark?
169 years are reported by both, from 1856 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Denmark rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Cuba ranks 81st and Denmark ranks 80th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Denmark: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/cuba/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/cuba/denmark/">Cuba vs Denmark: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.