Curacao vs Rwanda: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Curacao
2.29 million tonnes
in 2024
Rwanda
2.03 million tonnes
in 2024
Curacao rank
155th
Rwanda rank
156th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Curacao
  • Rwanda
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M192619752024

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 2.29 million tonnes against 2.03 million tonnes in Rwanda, a difference of 256,080 tonnes.

That makes Curacao's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Curacao ahead.

Curacao ranks 155th and Rwanda ranks 156th of 215 countries.

Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Rwanda Difference Ahead
1950s 9.44 million tonnes 25,041 tonnes 9.42 million tonnes Curacao
1960s 9.89 million tonnes 61,199 tonnes 9.83 million tonnes Curacao
1970s 11.55 million tonnes 162,682 tonnes 11.39 million tonnes Curacao
1980s 6.92 million tonnes 623,455 tonnes 6.29 million tonnes Curacao
1990s 3.69 million tonnes 480,215 tonnes 3.21 million tonnes Curacao
2000s 5.28 million tonnes 522,338 tonnes 4.76 million tonnes Curacao
2010s 5.34 million tonnes 946,652 tonnes 4.40 million tonnes Curacao
2020s 2.17 million tonnes 1.82 million tonnes 350,286 tonnes Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Curacao or Rwanda?
Curacao, at 2.29 million tonnes against 2.03 million tonnes in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Curacao and Rwanda?
256,080 tonnes, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Rwanda?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Curacao and Rwanda rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Curacao ranks 155th and Rwanda ranks 156th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Rwanda: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/curacao/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/curacao/rwanda/">Curacao vs Rwanda: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.