Ecuador vs Hungary: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Ecuador
45.98 million tonnes
in 2024
Hungary
40.02 million tonnes
in 2024
Ecuador rank
58th
Hungary rank
61st

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Ecuador
  • Hungary
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M185119372024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 45.98 million tonnes against 40.02 million tonnes in Hungary, a difference of 5.96 million tonnes.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Hungary ahead.

Ecuador ranks 58th and Hungary ranks 61st of 215 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Hungary Difference Ahead
1890s 786.12 tonnes 7.09 million tonnes 7.09 million tonnes Hungary
1900s 10,076 tonnes 9.89 million tonnes 9.88 million tonnes Hungary
1910s 43,806 tonnes 11.13 million tonnes 11.09 million tonnes Hungary
1920s 170,318 tonnes 11.28 million tonnes 11.11 million tonnes Hungary
1930s 835,636 tonnes 12.03 million tonnes 11.20 million tonnes Hungary
1940s 1.13 million tonnes 15.72 million tonnes 14.59 million tonnes Hungary
1950s 1.04 million tonnes 32.20 million tonnes 31.17 million tonnes Hungary
1960s 2.29 million tonnes 56.88 million tonnes 54.59 million tonnes Hungary
1970s 6.99 million tonnes 76.80 million tonnes 69.81 million tonnes Hungary
1980s 17.71 million tonnes 84.66 million tonnes 66.95 million tonnes Hungary
1990s 20.66 million tonnes 63.95 million tonnes 43.29 million tonnes Hungary
2000s 28.48 million tonnes 58.53 million tonnes 30.05 million tonnes Hungary
2010s 39.43 million tonnes 47.75 million tonnes 8.33 million tonnes Hungary
2020s 40.66 million tonnes 44.21 million tonnes 3.55 million tonnes Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Ecuador or Hungary?
Ecuador, at 45.98 million tonnes against 40.02 million tonnes in Hungary as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Ecuador and Hungary?
5.96 million tonnes, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Hungary?
133 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Hungary rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Ecuador ranks 58th and Hungary ranks 61st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Hungary: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/ecuador/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/ecuador/hungary/">Ecuador vs Hungary: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.