Ecuador vs Serbia: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Ecuador
45.98 million tonnes
in 2024
Serbia
42.02 million tonnes
in 2024
Ecuador rank
58th
Serbia rank
60th
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 45.98 million tonnes against 42.02 million tonnes in Serbia, a difference of 3.96 million tonnes.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 128 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Serbia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 58th and Serbia ranks 60th of 215 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 786.12 tonnes | 163,726 tonnes | 162,940 tonnes | Serbia |
| 1900s | 10,076 tonnes | 469,607 tonnes | 459,531 tonnes | Serbia |
| 1910s | 48,169 tonnes | 1.03 million tonnes | 977,168 tonnes | Serbia |
| 1920s | 170,318 tonnes | 3.15 million tonnes | 2.98 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 1930s | 835,636 tonnes | 3.79 million tonnes | 2.95 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 1940s | 1.13 million tonnes | 3.83 million tonnes | 2.69 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 1950s | 1.04 million tonnes | 10.02 million tonnes | 8.99 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 1960s | 2.29 million tonnes | 20.11 million tonnes | 17.82 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 1970s | 6.99 million tonnes | 38.80 million tonnes | 31.81 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 1980s | 17.71 million tonnes | 53.81 million tonnes | 36.10 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 1990s | 20.66 million tonnes | 43.79 million tonnes | 23.13 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 2000s | 28.48 million tonnes | 48.28 million tonnes | 19.80 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 2010s | 39.43 million tonnes | 44.40 million tonnes | 4.97 million tonnes | Serbia |
| 2020s | 40.66 million tonnes | 43.73 million tonnes | 3.07 million tonnes | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Ecuador, at 45.98 million tonnes against 42.02 million tonnes in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 3.96 million tonnes, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 128 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
- Ecuador ranks 58th and Serbia ranks 60th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.