Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Guatemala
19.88 million tonnes
in 2024
Sri Lanka
20.83 million tonnes
in 2024
Guatemala rank
90th
Sri Lanka rank
88th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sri Lanka
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M187019472024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 20.83 million tonnes against 19.88 million tonnes in Guatemala, a difference of 945,100 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Guatemala ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 88th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1950s 857,371 tonnes 1.84 million tonnes 979,125 tonnes Sri Lanka
1960s 1.75 million tonnes 2.78 million tonnes 1.02 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1970s 3.29 million tonnes 3.26 million tonnes 21,548 tonnes Guatemala
1980s 3.79 million tonnes 3.88 million tonnes 82,842 tonnes Sri Lanka
1990s 6.60 million tonnes 5.92 million tonnes 681,348 tonnes Guatemala
2000s 11.08 million tonnes 11.28 million tonnes 200,029 tonnes Sri Lanka
2010s 14.56 million tonnes 17.87 million tonnes 3.31 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2020s 19.13 million tonnes 19.92 million tonnes 786,620 tonnes Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Guatemala or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 20.83 million tonnes against 19.88 million tonnes in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Guatemala and Sri Lanka?
945,100 tonnes, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sri Lanka?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Sri Lanka rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Guatemala ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 88th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/guatemala/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/guatemala/sri-lanka/">Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.