Hong Kong vs Norway: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Hong Kong
33.32 million tonnes
in 2024
Norway
37.18 million tonnes
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
68th
Norway rank
65th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Norway
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M185019372024

How they compare

Norway currently reports 37.18 million tonnes against 33.32 million tonnes in Hong Kong, a difference of 3.86 million tonnes.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 82 shared years of data; in 1938 it was Norway ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 68th and Norway ranks 65th of 215 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Norway Difference Ahead
1930s 54,514 tonnes 11.50 million tonnes 11.44 million tonnes Norway
1940s 36,343 tonnes 8.67 million tonnes 8.63 million tonnes Norway
1950s 1.94 million tonnes 10.50 million tonnes 8.56 million tonnes Norway
1960s 4.84 million tonnes 17.02 million tonnes 12.17 million tonnes Norway
1970s 11.60 million tonnes 30.72 million tonnes 19.12 million tonnes Norway
1980s 23.39 million tonnes 33.03 million tonnes 9.64 million tonnes Norway
1990s 32.65 million tonnes 38.28 million tonnes 5.62 million tonnes Norway
2000s 41.31 million tonnes 43.69 million tonnes 2.38 million tonnes Norway
2010s 42.84 million tonnes 44.60 million tonnes 1.75 million tonnes Norway
2020s 32.84 million tonnes 39.84 million tonnes 7.00 million tonnes Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Hong Kong or Norway?
Norway, at 37.18 million tonnes against 33.32 million tonnes in Hong Kong as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Hong Kong and Norway?
3.86 million tonnes, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Norway?
82 years are reported by both, from 1938 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and Norway rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Hong Kong ranks 68th and Norway ranks 65th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Norway: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/">Hong Kong vs Norway: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.