Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Kazakhstan
287.01 million tonnes
in 2024
Malaysia
290.22 million tonnes
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
21st
Malaysia rank
20th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Malaysia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M185019372024

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 290.22 million tonnes against 287.01 million tonnes in Kazakhstan, a difference of 3.22 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 135 shared years of data; in 1890 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 21st and Malaysia ranks 20th of 215 countries.

Across the 14 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 13 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Malaysia Difference Ahead
1890s 2.82 million tonnes 70,715 tonnes 2.75 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1900s 5.44 million tonnes 66,685 tonnes 5.38 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1910s 6.16 million tonnes 343,500 tonnes 5.82 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1920s 4.34 million tonnes 2.73 million tonnes 1.61 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1930s 19.68 million tonnes 2.13 million tonnes 17.54 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1940s 27.77 million tonnes 1.21 million tonnes 26.55 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1950s 67.01 million tonnes 5.43 million tonnes 61.58 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1960s 122.29 million tonnes 7.49 million tonnes 114.80 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1970s 192.90 million tonnes 20.22 million tonnes 172.67 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1980s 245.93 million tonnes 37.27 million tonnes 208.67 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1990s 187.84 million tonnes 91.91 million tonnes 95.94 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2000s 189.06 million tonnes 160.94 million tonnes 28.12 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2010s 283.23 million tonnes 236.05 million tonnes 47.18 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2020s 274.84 million tonnes 276.78 million tonnes 1.94 million tonnes Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 290.22 million tonnes against 287.01 million tonnes in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
3.22 million tonnes, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
135 years are reported by both, from 1890 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and Malaysia rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Kazakhstan ranks 21st and Malaysia ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/kazakhstan/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/kazakhstan/malaysia/">Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.