Kiribati vs Nauru: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Kiribati
72,456 tonnes
in 2024
Nauru
61,390 tonnes
in 2024
Kiribati rank
206th
Nauru rank
207th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Kiribati
  • Nauru
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 72,456 tonnes against 61,390 tonnes in Nauru, a difference of 11,066 tonnes.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Nauru ahead.

Kiribati ranks 206th and Nauru ranks 207th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 17,709 tonnes 42,747 tonnes 25,037 tonnes Nauru
1970s 28,213 tonnes 95,997 tonnes 67,784 tonnes Nauru
1980s 23,450 tonnes 138,133 tonnes 114,683 tonnes Nauru
1990s 27,846 tonnes 109,554 tonnes 81,707 tonnes Nauru
2000s 43,968 tonnes 60,090 tonnes 16,122 tonnes Nauru
2010s 60,090 tonnes 49,098 tonnes 10,992 tonnes Kiribati
2020s 70,118 tonnes 57,800 tonnes 12,318 tonnes Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Kiribati or Nauru?
Kiribati, at 72,456 tonnes against 61,390 tonnes in Nauru as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Kiribati and Nauru?
11,066 tonnes, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
61 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Kiribati ranks 206th and Nauru ranks 207th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Nauru: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/kiribati/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/kiribati/naoero/">Kiribati vs Nauru: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.