Sri Lanka vs Tanzania: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled

Sri Lanka
20.83 million tonnes
in 2024
Tanzania
20.02 million tonnes
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
88th
Tanzania rank
89th

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Tanzania
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M195019872024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 20.83 million tonnes against 20.02 million tonnes in Tanzania, a difference of 807,100 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 88th and Tanzania ranks 89th of 215 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Tanzania Difference Ahead
1950s 1.84 million tonnes 601,995 tonnes 1.23 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1960s 2.78 million tonnes 1.19 million tonnes 1.59 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1970s 3.26 million tonnes 2.32 million tonnes 943,503 tonnes Sri Lanka
1980s 3.88 million tonnes 2.21 million tonnes 1.67 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1990s 5.92 million tonnes 2.38 million tonnes 3.54 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2000s 11.28 million tonnes 4.57 million tonnes 6.71 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2010s 17.87 million tonnes 11.85 million tonnes 6.02 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2020s 19.92 million tonnes 18.73 million tonnes 1.19 million tonnes Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled, Sri Lanka or Tanzania?
Sri Lanka, at 20.83 million tonnes against 20.02 million tonnes in Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled between Sri Lanka and Tanzania?
807,100 tonnes, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tanzania?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Sri Lanka and Tanzania rank globally for co₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled?
Sri Lanka ranks 88th and Tanzania ranks 89th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Tanzania: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/sri-lanka/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-and-land-use-change-gaps-filled/sri-lanka/tanzania/">Sri Lanka vs Tanzania: CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 22,718 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

CO₂ emissions from fossil fuels and land-use change with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.