Australia vs Oman: Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled
Australia
14.48
in 2024
Oman
15.65
in 2024
Australia rank
11th
Oman rank
10th
Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled over time
- Australia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 15.65 against 14.48 in Australia, a difference of 1.17.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 11th and Oman ranks 10th of 213 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.24 | 0.1588 | 10.09 | Australia |
| 1970s | 12.35 | 5.87 | 6.48 | Australia |
| 1980s | 14.22 | 6.21 | 8.01 | Australia |
| 1990s | 16.85 | 7.76 | 9.09 | Australia |
| 2000s | 18.76 | 13.99 | 4.78 | Australia |
| 2010s | 17.08 | 16.57 | 0.5118 | Australia |
| 2020s | 14.82 | 16.1 | 1.28 | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled, Australia or Oman?
- Oman, at 15.65 against 14.48 in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled between Australia and Oman?
- 1.17, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Oman?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Oman rank globally for co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled?
- Australia ranks 11th and Oman ranks 10th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Co2 emissions vs gdp with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.