Dominica vs Ecuador: Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled
Dominica
2.58
in 2024
Ecuador
2.54
in 2024
Dominica rank
119th
Ecuador rank
121st
Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled over time
- Dominica
- Ecuador
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 2.58 against 2.54 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Ecuador ahead.
Dominica ranks 119th and Ecuador ranks 121st of 213 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.0978 | 0.2639 | 0.1661 | Ecuador |
| 1960s | 0.2411 | 0.4297 | 0.1885 | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 0.3857 | 0.9731 | 0.5874 | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 0.6339 | 1.93 | 1.3 | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 1.01 | 1.8 | 0.7876 | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2.03 | 2.06 | 0.032 | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 2.38 | 2.44 | 0.0576 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 2.45 | 2.28 | 0.1725 | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled, Dominica or Ecuador?
- Dominica, at 2.58 against 2.54 in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled between Dominica and Ecuador?
- 0.04, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Ecuador?
- 74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
- How do Dominica and Ecuador rank globally for co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled?
- Dominica ranks 119th and Ecuador ranks 121st of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Co2 emissions vs gdp with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.