Mauritania vs Sri Lanka: Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled
Mauritania
1.01
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0.9014
in 2024
Mauritania rank
160th
Sri Lanka rank
161st
Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled over time
- Mauritania
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 1.01 against 0.9014 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.1086.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1959 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Mauritania ranks 160th and Sri Lanka ranks 161st of 213 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.041 | 0.2179 | 0.1769 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | 0.1434 | 0.2552 | 0.1117 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 0.3947 | 0.244 | 0.1507 | Mauritania |
| 1980s | 0.8108 | 0.2495 | 0.5613 | Mauritania |
| 1990s | 0.4357 | 0.3347 | 0.101 | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 0.502 | 0.5604 | 0.0584 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.7483 | 0.8231 | 0.0748 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 1.02 | 0.8725 | 0.1448 | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled, Mauritania or Sri Lanka?
- Mauritania, at 1.01 against 0.9014 in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled between Mauritania and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1086, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sri Lanka?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1959 to 2024.
- How do Mauritania and Sri Lanka rank globally for co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled?
- Mauritania ranks 160th and Sri Lanka ranks 161st of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Co2 emissions vs gdp with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.