Bahamas vs Maldives: Co2 fossil plus land use

Bahamas
3.05 million
in 2024
Maldives
2.31 million
in 2024
Bahamas rank
161st
Maldives rank
162nd

Co2 fossil plus land use over time

  • Bahamas
  • Maldives
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M195019872024

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 3.05 million against 2.31 million in Maldives, a difference of 744,190.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.3 times Maldives's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 161st and Maldives ranks 162nd of 194 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Maldives Difference Ahead
1970s 7.32 million 11,037 7.31 million Bahamas
1980s 2.35 million 69,627 2.28 million Bahamas
1990s 1.82 million 253,549 1.57 million Bahamas
2000s 1.93 million 652,353 1.28 million Bahamas
2010s 2.25 million 1.34 million 912,787 Bahamas
2020s 2.73 million 2.08 million 650,238 Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 fossil plus land use, Bahamas or Maldives?
Bahamas, at 3.05 million against 2.31 million in Maldives as of 2024.
What is the difference in co2 fossil plus land use between Bahamas and Maldives?
744,190, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Maldives?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Maldives rank globally for co2 fossil plus land use?
Bahamas ranks 161st and Maldives ranks 162nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Co2 fossil plus land use
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
194 places, 20,936 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed