Botswana vs Costa Rica: Co2 fossil plus land use
Botswana
7.27 million
in 2024
Costa Rica
7.77 million
in 2024
Botswana rank
143rd
Costa Rica rank
141st
Co2 fossil plus land use over time
- Botswana
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 7.77 million against 7.27 million in Botswana, a difference of 508,570.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Botswana ranks 143rd and Costa Rica ranks 141st of 194 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.89 million | 48.41 million | 45.51 million | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 3.99 million | 27.09 million | 23.10 million | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 6.03 million | 7.34 million | 1.31 million | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 6.19 million | 9.96 million | 3.77 million | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 7.76 million | 10.37 million | 2.61 million | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 6.63 million | 7.15 million | 517,576 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 fossil plus land use, Botswana or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 7.77 million against 7.27 million in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 fossil plus land use between Botswana and Costa Rica?
- 508,570, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Costa Rica?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Costa Rica rank globally for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Botswana ranks 143rd and Costa Rica ranks 141st of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.