Kiribati vs Tuvalu: Co2 fossil plus land use
Kiribati
72,456
in 2024
Tuvalu
11,440
in 2024
Kiribati rank
187th
Tuvalu rank
190th
Co2 fossil plus land use over time
- Kiribati
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 72,456 against 11,440 in Tuvalu, a difference of 61,016.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 6.3 times Tuvalu's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 187th and Tuvalu ranks 190th of 194 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 27,846 | 5,130 | 22,717 | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 43,968 | 9,893 | 34,075 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 60,090 | 9,160 | 50,930 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 70,118 | 11,071 | 59,047 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 fossil plus land use, Kiribati or Tuvalu?
- Kiribati, at 72,456 against 11,440 in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 fossil plus land use between Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 61,016, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tuvalu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Tuvalu rank globally for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Kiribati ranks 187th and Tuvalu ranks 190th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.