Nauru vs Tuvalu: Co2 fossil plus land use
Nauru
61,390
in 2024
Tuvalu
11,440
in 2024
Nauru rank
188th
Tuvalu rank
190th
Co2 fossil plus land use over time
- Nauru
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 61,390 against 11,440 in Tuvalu, a difference of 49,950.
That makes Nauru's figure about 5.4 times Tuvalu's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 188th and Tuvalu ranks 190th of 194 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 109,554 | 5,130 | 104,424 | Nauru |
| 2000s | 60,090 | 9,893 | 50,197 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 49,098 | 9,160 | 39,938 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 57,800 | 11,071 | 46,729 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 fossil plus land use, Nauru or Tuvalu?
- Nauru, at 61,390 against 11,440 in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 fossil plus land use between Nauru and Tuvalu?
- 49,950, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tuvalu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Tuvalu rank globally for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Nauru ranks 188th and Tuvalu ranks 190th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.