Nepal vs Serbia: Co2 fossil plus land use
Nepal
25.53 million
in 2024
Serbia
25.61 million
in 2024
Nepal rank
103rd
Serbia rank
102nd
Co2 fossil plus land use over time
- Nepal
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 25.61 million against 25.53 million in Nepal, a difference of 88,900.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Serbia ahead.
Nepal ranks 103rd and Serbia ranks 102nd of 194 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 17.87 million | 30.32 million | 12.45 million | Serbia |
| 1960s | 18.90 million | 27.67 million | 8.78 million | Serbia |
| 1970s | 31.86 million | 38.90 million | 7.04 million | Serbia |
| 1980s | 20.86 million | 52.11 million | 31.25 million | Serbia |
| 1990s | 18.40 million | 35.99 million | 17.59 million | Serbia |
| 2000s | 22.70 million | 27.90 million | 5.19 million | Serbia |
| 2010s | 19.20 million | 20.23 million | 1.03 million | Serbia |
| 2020s | 25.56 million | 25.88 million | 314,840 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 fossil plus land use, Nepal or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 25.61 million against 25.53 million in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 fossil plus land use between Nepal and Serbia?
- 88,900, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Serbia?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Serbia rank globally for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Nepal ranks 103rd and Serbia ranks 102nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.