Cuba vs Lithuania: Co2 intensity, per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Lithuania
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Cuba rank
86th
Lithuania rank
89th
Co2 intensity, per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Lithuania
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.
Cuba ranks 86th and Lithuania ranks 89th of 162 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 intensity, per unit of gdp, Cuba or Lithuania?
- Cuba, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Lithuania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in co2 intensity, per unit of gdp between Cuba and Lithuania?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Lithuania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Lithuania rank globally for co2 intensity, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 86th and Lithuania ranks 89th of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Co2 intensity, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Co2 intensity divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.