Guatemala vs Latvia: Co2 land use per capita

Guatemala
1.61
in 2024
Latvia
1.57
in 2024
Guatemala rank
33rd
Latvia rank
34th

Co2 land use per capita over time

  • Guatemala
  • Latvia
01020185019372024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 1.61 against 1.57 in Latvia, a difference of 0.04.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 175 shared years of data; in 1850 it was Latvia ahead.

Guatemala ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 34th of 194 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 12 and Latvia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Latvia Difference Ahead
1850s 9.8 10.68 0.8831 Latvia
1860s 7.39 8.59 1.2 Latvia
1870s 4.29 7.26 2.97 Latvia
1880s 2.38 6.33 3.94 Latvia
1890s 1.79 5.48 3.69 Latvia
1900s 3.59 4.81 1.22 Latvia
1910s 4.51 3.81 0.7019 Guatemala
1920s 5.35 3.64 1.71 Guatemala
1930s 10.53 2.63 7.9 Guatemala
1940s 18.12 1.23 16.89 Guatemala
1950s 16.24 1.77 14.47 Guatemala
1960s 5.46 1.21 4.25 Guatemala
1970s 4.42 0.8885 3.53 Guatemala
1980s 6.35 0.7757 5.58 Guatemala
1990s 5.22 -1.52 6.73 Guatemala
2000s 3.39 -1.39 4.78 Guatemala
2010s 1.86 0.552 1.31 Guatemala
2020s 1.62 1.18 0.4384 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 land use per capita, Guatemala or Latvia?
Guatemala, at 1.61 against 1.57 in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in co2 land use per capita between Guatemala and Latvia?
0.04, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Latvia?
175 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Latvia rank globally for co2 land use per capita?
Guatemala ranks 33rd and Latvia ranks 34th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Co2 land use per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Co2 land use per capita
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
194 places, 33,660 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed