Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Croatia: CO₂ emissions per capita

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
4.95 tonnes per person
in 2024
Croatia
4.76 tonnes per person
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
69th
Croatia rank
72nd

CO₂ emissions per capita over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Croatia
0102030188519542024

How they compare

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 4.95 tonnes per person against 4.76 tonnes per person in Croatia, a difference of 0.19 tonnes per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 69th and Croatia ranks 72nd of 213 countries.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Croatia Difference Ahead
1950s 23.58 tonnes per person 0.92 tonnes per person 22.66 tonnes per person Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1960s 21.39 tonnes per person 1.73 tonnes per person 19.66 tonnes per person Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1970s 20.12 tonnes per person 3.2 tonnes per person 16.93 tonnes per person Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1980s 10.54 tonnes per person 4.26 tonnes per person 6.28 tonnes per person Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
1990s 5.13 tonnes per person 3.91 tonnes per person 1.22 tonnes per person Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2000s 5.89 tonnes per person 5.22 tonnes per person 0.6675 tonnes per person Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2010s 4.96 tonnes per person 4.48 tonnes per person 0.4857 tonnes per person Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2020s 5 tonnes per person 4.54 tonnes per person 0.4635 tonnes per person Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co₂ emissions per capita, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Croatia?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 4.95 tonnes per person against 4.76 tonnes per person in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in co₂ emissions per capita between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Croatia?
0.19 tonnes per person, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Croatia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Croatia rank globally for co₂ emissions per capita?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 69th and Croatia ranks 72nd of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Croatia: CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-per-capita-marimekko/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/co2-per-capita-marimekko/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/croatia/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Croatia: CO₂ emissions per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CO₂ emissions per capita
Unit
tonnes per person
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
213 places, 22,919 data points, 1800–2024
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions from burning fossil fuels and industrial processes. This includes emissions from transport, electricity generation, and heating, but not land-use change.