Cuba vs Saint Helena: Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity
Cuba
2.23
in 2024
Saint Helena
2.16
in 2024
Cuba rank
127th
Saint Helena rank
130th
Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity over time
- Cuba
- Saint Helena
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2.23 against 2.16 in Saint Helena, a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 127th and Saint Helena ranks 130th of 213 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Saint Helena | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.88 | 0.6488 | 1.23 | Cuba |
| 1980s | 3.3 | 0.7367 | 2.56 | Cuba |
| 1990s | 2.19 | 1.55 | 0.6376 | Cuba |
| 2000s | 2.31 | 1.89 | 0.4191 | Cuba |
| 2010s | 2.43 | 2.14 | 0.2864 | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2.08 | 1.93 | 0.1489 | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 per capita vs renewable electricity, Cuba or Saint Helena?
- Cuba, at 2.23 against 2.16 in Saint Helena as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 per capita vs renewable electricity between Cuba and Saint Helena?
- 0.07, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Saint Helena?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Saint Helena rank globally for co2 per capita vs renewable electricity?
- Cuba ranks 127th and Saint Helena ranks 130th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.