Curacao vs Mongolia: Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity

Curacao
12.34
in 2024
Mongolia
12.86
in 2024
Curacao rank
18th
Mongolia rank
16th

Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity over time

  • Curacao
  • Mongolia
0255075100125195019872024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 12.86 against 12.34 in Curacao, a difference of 0.52.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Curacao ahead.

Curacao ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 213 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 7 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Mongolia Difference Ahead
1950s 81.72 0.7058 81.02 Curacao
1960s 70.07 1.73 68.34 Curacao
1970s 74.88 2.8 72.08 Curacao
1980s 44.14 4.4 39.74 Curacao
1990s 24.09 3.84 20.25 Curacao
2000s 35.1 3.69 31.41 Curacao
2010s 32.17 10.69 21.47 Curacao
2020s 11.71 12.27 0.5609 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 per capita vs renewable electricity, Curacao or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 12.86 against 12.34 in Curacao as of 2024.
What is the difference in co2 per capita vs renewable electricity between Curacao and Mongolia?
0.52, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Mongolia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Curacao and Mongolia rank globally for co2 per capita vs renewable electricity?
Curacao ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 213 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
213 places, 22,945 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed