Panama vs Wallis and Futuna: Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity
Panama
2.8
in 2024
Wallis and Futuna
2.7
in 2024
Panama rank
111th
Wallis and Futuna rank
112th
Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity over time
- Panama
- Wallis and Futuna
How they compare
Panama currently reports 2.8 against 2.7 in Wallis and Futuna, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Wallis and Futuna ahead.
Panama ranks 111th and Wallis and Futuna ranks 112th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 3 and Wallis and Futuna in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Wallis and Futuna | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.53 | 1.48 | 0.0522 | Panama |
| 2000s | 2 | 1.75 | 0.2491 | Panama |
| 2010s | 2.59 | 2.08 | 0.5049 | Panama |
| 2020s | 2.45 | 2.57 | 0.1225 | Wallis and Futuna |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 per capita vs renewable electricity, Panama or Wallis and Futuna?
- Panama, at 2.8 against 2.7 in Wallis and Futuna as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 per capita vs renewable electricity between Panama and Wallis and Futuna?
- 0.1, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Wallis and Futuna?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for co2 per capita vs renewable electricity?
- Panama ranks 111th and Wallis and Futuna ranks 112th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Co2 per capita vs renewable electricity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.