Americas vs Belgium: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Americas
- Belgium
How they compare
Americas currently reports 122.59 kt against 43.29 kt in Belgium, a difference of 79.3 kt.
That makes Americas's figure about 2.8 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Belgium ahead.
Americas ranks 16th and Belgium ranks 13th of 23 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Americas averaged higher in 1 and Belgium in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Americas | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.56 kt | 65.95 kt | 57.39 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 65.41 kt | 43.56 kt | 21.85 kt | Americas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Americas or Belgium?
- Americas, at 122.59 kt against 43.29 kt in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Americas and Belgium?
- 79.3 kt, with Americas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and Belgium?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Americas and Belgium rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Americas ranks 16th and Belgium ranks 13th of 23 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.