Botswana vs Latvia: Coal — Emissions (CO2)
Coal — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Botswana
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0903 kt against 0 kt in Botswana, a difference of 0.0903 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 36th and Latvia ranks 34th of 39 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.1 kt | 8.86 kt | 18.25 kt | Botswana |
| 2010s | 23.52 kt | 2.96 kt | 20.56 kt | Botswana |
| 2020s | 12.79 kt | 0.0903 kt | 12.7 kt | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Botswana or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0903 kt against 0 kt in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Botswana and Latvia?
- 0.0903 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Latvia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Latvia rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Botswana ranks 36th and Latvia ranks 34th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.