Chile vs Zimbabwe: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Chile
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 229.25 kt against 122.59 kt in Chile, a difference of 106.66 kt.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.9 times Chile's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 38 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.99 kt | 2,184 kt | 2,089 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 13.09 kt | 396.89 kt | 383.8 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 65.41 kt | 216.75 kt | 151.33 kt | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Chile or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 229.25 kt against 122.59 kt in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 106.66 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Chile ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.