New Zealand vs Sweden: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- New Zealand
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 10.32 kt against 7.45 kt in New Zealand, a difference of 2.87 kt.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
New Zealand ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 19th of 36 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, New Zealand or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 10.32 kt against 7.45 kt in New Zealand as of 1998.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between New Zealand and Sweden?
- 2.87 kt, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1998.
- How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for coal — emissions?
- New Zealand ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 19th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.