Oceania vs Sweden: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Oceania
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 10.32 kt against 7.45 kt in Oceania, a difference of 2.87 kt.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.4 times Oceania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Oceania ranks 23rd and Sweden ranks 21st of 25 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Oceania or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 10.32 kt against 7.45 kt in Oceania as of 1998.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Oceania and Sweden?
- 2.87 kt, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oceania and Sweden?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1998.
- How do Oceania and Sweden rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Oceania ranks 23rd and Sweden ranks 21st of 25 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.