Austria vs Belarus: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Belarus
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Belarus, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Austria ranks 30th and Belarus ranks 30th of 38 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0012 kt | 0.001 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Austria or Belarus?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Austria and Belarus?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belarus?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Austria and Belarus rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Austria ranks 30th and Belarus ranks 30th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.