Austria vs Botswana: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Botswana
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Botswana, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 28th and Botswana ranks 28th of 36 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0004 kt | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Austria or Botswana?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Austria and Botswana?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Botswana?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Botswana rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Austria ranks 28th and Botswana ranks 28th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.