Belarus vs Estonia: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Estonia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Estonia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 30th and Estonia ranks 30th of 38 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.001 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Belarus or Estonia?
- Belarus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Estonia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Belarus and Estonia?
- 0 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Estonia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Belarus and Estonia rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 30th and Estonia ranks 30th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.