Belarus vs Latvia: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Latvia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 30th of 38 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0007 kt | 0.0005 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Belarus or Latvia?
- Belarus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Belarus and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Belarus and Latvia rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 30th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.