Belgium vs Finland: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Belgium
- Finland
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.0007 kt against 0.0002 kt in Finland, a difference of 0.0005 kt.
That makes Belgium's figure about 3.5 times Finland's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 14th and Finland ranks 16th of 38 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0008 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0005 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Belgium or Finland?
- Belgium, at 0.0007 kt against 0.0002 kt in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Belgium and Finland?
- 0.0005 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Finland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Finland rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 14th and Finland ranks 16th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.