Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Colombia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0036 kt against 0.003 kt in Colombia, a difference of 0.0006 kt.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Colombia ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 38 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0031 kt | 0.0466 kt | 0.0435 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0037 kt | 0.0144 kt | 0.0107 kt | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0036 kt against 0.003 kt in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0006 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
- How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Colombia ranks 8th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 38 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.