Australia and New Zealand vs Sweden: Coal — Energy use in agriculture
Coal — Energy use in agriculture over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 109.07 TJ against 78.79 TJ in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 30.28 TJ.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 19th of 36 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — energy use in agriculture, Australia and New Zealand or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 109.07 TJ against 78.79 TJ in Australia and New Zealand as of 1998.
- What is the difference in coal — energy use in agriculture between Australia and New Zealand and Sweden?
- 30.28 TJ, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sweden?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1998.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for coal — energy use in agriculture?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 21st and Sweden ranks 19th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Energy use in agriculture. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.