Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Cold Chain F-Gas: Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5) … square

Sweden
0.0012 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0012 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden rank
124th
Zimbabwe rank
125th

Cold Chain F-Gas: Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5) … square over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0010.002199020062023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0012 kt per square kilometre against 0.0012 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 178 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cold chain f-gas — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases (ar5), per square, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Sweden, at 0.0012 kt per square kilometre against 0.0012 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cold chain f-gas — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases (ar5), per square between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for cold chain f-gas — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases (ar5), per square?
Sweden ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 125th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cold Chain F-Gas — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Cold Chain F-Gas — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cold-chain-f-gas-emissions-co2eq-from-f-gases-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cold-chain-f-gas-emissions-co2eq-from-f-gases-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Cold Chain F-Gas — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cold Chain F-Gas — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 5,932 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Cold Chain F-Gas — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.