Costa Rica vs Namibia: Consumption co2 per capita vs gdppc
Costa Rica
2.88
in 2023
Namibia
3.26
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
73rd
Namibia rank
70th
Consumption co2 per capita vs gdppc over time
- Costa Rica
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3.26 against 2.88 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.38.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 73rd and Namibia ranks 70th of 120 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.79 | 0.8613 | 0.9254 | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 2.59 | 1.19 | 1.41 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 2.82 | 4.19 | 1.38 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 2.74 | 3.34 | 0.5927 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption co2 per capita vs gdppc, Costa Rica or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 3.26 against 2.88 in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in consumption co2 per capita vs gdppc between Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 0.38, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Namibia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Namibia rank globally for consumption co2 per capita vs gdppc?
- Costa Rica ranks 73rd and Namibia ranks 70th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Consumption co2 per capita vs gdppc. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.