Belgium vs Cuba: Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Belgium
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Cuba
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Belgium rank
118th
Cuba rank
117th
Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Belgium
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 118th and Cuba ranks 117th of 161 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Belgium or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Belgium and Cuba?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cuba?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Cuba rank globally for crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Belgium ranks 118th and Cuba ranks 117th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.