Australia and New Zealand vs European Union (27): Crop Residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Australia and New Zealand
3,749 kt
in 2050
European Union (27)
16,501 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
16th
European Union (27) rank
17th

Crop Residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • European Union (27)
05.0k10.0k15.0k196120052050

How they compare

European Union (27) currently reports 16,501 kt against 3,749 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 12,752 kt.

That makes European Union (27)'s figure about 4.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, European Union (27) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and European Union (27) ranks 17th of 215 countries.

European Union (27) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand European Union (27) Difference Ahead
1960s 1,013 kt 9,984 kt 8,971 kt European Union (27)
1970s 1,321 kt 11,904 kt 10,584 kt European Union (27)
1980s 1,708 kt 13,749 kt 12,041 kt European Union (27)
1990s 1,837 kt 14,489 kt 12,652 kt European Union (27)
2000s 2,270 kt 15,132 kt 12,862 kt European Union (27)
2010s 2,612 kt 15,779 kt 13,167 kt European Union (27)
2020s 3,240 kt 15,706 kt 12,466 kt European Union (27)
2030s 3,447 kt 16,467 kt 13,020 kt European Union (27)
2050s 3,749 kt 16,501 kt 12,752 kt European Union (27)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Australia and New Zealand or European Union (27)?
European Union (27), at 16,501 kt against 3,749 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Australia and New Zealand and European Union (27)?
12,752 kt, with European Union (27) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and European Union (27)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and European Union (27) rank globally for crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and European Union (27) ranks 17th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs European Union (27): Crop Residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/european-union-27/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/european-union-27/">Australia and New Zealand vs European Union (27): Crop Residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop Residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,448 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf